[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3700141f-e12f-4a58-8e36-5f95ef500d8b@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:11:31 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rrichter@....com, Terry.Bowman@....com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, alison.schofield@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, osalvador@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] acpi,srat: give memory block size advice based on
CFMWS alignment
On 01.11.24 14:47, Gregory Price wrote:
> Capacity is stranded when CFMWS regions are not aligned to block size.
> On x86, block size increases with capacity (2G blocks @ 64G capacity).
>
> Use CFMWS base/size to report memory block size alignment advice.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists