linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0f27f32e-bf00-4f9d-a0b6-0625a6dae203@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 11:04:47 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, konstantin@...uxfoundation.org,
 baocheng.su@...mens.com, tobias.schaffner@...mens.com, pavel@....cz,
 ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
 Benedikt Niedermayr <benedikt.niedermayr@...mens.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
 felix.moessbauer@...mens.com, christian.storm@...mens.com,
 quirin.gylstorff@...mens.com, chao.zeng@...mens.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

Hi Lee,

On 1-Nov-24 6:28 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:23:59 +0100, Benedikt Niedermayr wrote:
>> Since complaints about bouncing maintainers raised [1] we have now a
>> replacement for maintainers that stepped away from their duties.
>>
>> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg47105.html
>>
>>
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers
>       commit: 64dd44a658065ab5595bbfe2cb4d8fd30c9e34a2

I'm not seeing this on either of:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git/log/?h=for-leds-next
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next

?

Note I'm fine with you picking this up, I just want to make sure that
it does not fall through the cracks and drop it from my own patch queue
since it also touches pdx86 MAINTAINERS entries.

Regards,

Hans