linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241105155520.GC1807686@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 15:55:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: konstantin@...uxfoundation.org, baocheng.su@...mens.com,
	tobias.schaffner@...mens.com, pavel@....cz,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	Benedikt Niedermayr <benedikt.niedermayr@...mens.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	felix.moessbauer@...mens.com, christian.storm@...mens.com,
	quirin.gylstorff@...mens.com, chao.zeng@...mens.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers

On Mon, 04 Nov 2024, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On 1-Nov-24 6:28 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:23:59 +0100, Benedikt Niedermayr wrote:
> >> Since complaints about bouncing maintainers raised [1] we have now a
> >> replacement for maintainers that stepped away from their duties.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg47105.html
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/1] MAINTAINERS: replace bouncing maintainers
> >       commit: 64dd44a658065ab5595bbfe2cb4d8fd30c9e34a2
> 
> I'm not seeing this on either of:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git/log/?h=for-leds-next
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next
> 
> ?
> 
> Note I'm fine with you picking this up, I just want to make sure that
> it does not fall through the cracks and drop it from my own patch queue
> since it also touches pdx86 MAINTAINERS entries.

I'm pushing it through the LEDs tree.  It'll be in -next tomorrow.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]