linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Adjust SRSO mitigation to new features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241105192436.GFZypw9DqdNIObaWn5@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:24:36 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Adjust SRSO mitigation to new features

On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 11:18:16AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> It gets there, usually (as evidenced by my response).  But even for me, there's
> a non-zero chance I'll miss something that's only Cc'd to kvm@, largely because
> kvm@ is used by all things virt, i.e. it's a bit noisy:
> 
> $ git grep kvm@ MAINTAINERS | wc -l
> 29

Hm, ok, so what do you guys prefer to be CCed on? Everyone from
get_maintainer.pl's output? commit signers, authors, everyone? Or?

> Heh, I found that.  Not very helpful.
> 
> If you can't document the specifics, can you at least describe the performance
> implications?  It's practically impossible to give meaningful feedback without
> having any idea what the magic bit does.

Lemme see what I can get clearance on...

Stay tuned.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette