linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mux: constify mux class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c69d0e0-c090-76be-3bd2-e5e92c585ffb@axentia.se>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:53:13 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mux: constify mux class

Hi Bartosz,

2024-11-01 at 15:21, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 9:08 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 2:25 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> All class functions used here take a const pointer to the class
>>> structure so we can make the struct itself constant.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mux/core.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
>>> index 78c0022697ec..02be4ba37257 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mux/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct mux_state {
>>>         unsigned int state;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> -static struct class mux_class = {
>>> +static const struct class mux_class = {
>>>         .name = "mux",
>>>  };
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.43.0
>>>
>>
>> Gentle ping.
>>
>> Bart
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Your email doesn't bounce so I assume you are getting this. Any reason
> why this simple change is not being picked up?

I'm here, and am just being slow as usual. Sorry about that. I have now
added the patch to linux-next.

Cheers,
Peter