linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mux: constify mux class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Meo9rL62hNLJE6RuXe3S2N7vRJ1bWxeG2LbgqrJRmW7HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:37:18 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mux: constify mux class

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:53 PM Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
>
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> 2024-11-01 at 15:21, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 9:08 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 2:25 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >>>
> >>> All class functions used here take a const pointer to the class
> >>> structure so we can make the struct itself constant.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mux/core.c | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
> >>> index 78c0022697ec..02be4ba37257 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mux/core.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
> >>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct mux_state {
> >>>         unsigned int state;
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>> -static struct class mux_class = {
> >>> +static const struct class mux_class = {
> >>>         .name = "mux",
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.43.0
> >>>
> >>
> >> Gentle ping.
> >>
> >> Bart
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > Your email doesn't bounce so I assume you are getting this. Any reason
> > why this simple change is not being picked up?
>
> I'm here, and am just being slow as usual. Sorry about that. I have now
> added the patch to linux-next.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter

Peter,

This commit is in next but it's not gone upstream and it's almost the
end of the merge window. I don't see any pending PR from you. Can this
go upstream?

Bartosz