linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] gpio: Get rid of deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfQw1YmOoq-rK5Bq3uDK8cmjG_xsUgVDs28phsqkcHofA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:43:32 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, 
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, 
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] gpio: Get rid of deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:34:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This series targets the deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as only a few users
> > left. Convert those users to call modern APIs and drop this legacy piece
> > from the source tree.
> >
> > The idea is to route this via GPIO tree, please Ack.
>
> Thank you for Acks, folks!
>
> Dominik, is it possible to get yours or are you inactive nowadays (I saw
> last mention of your name ca. 2023).
>
> Bart, we have all Acks except pcmcia (see also above), and the change is
> the same all over the places, do you think it's okay to apply if Dominik
> won't respond for a few days?
>

If we don't get an ack until Friday, I will take it as is.

Bart