[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZytP0XGgmz_R5gos@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:15:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] gpio: Get rid of deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:34:18AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This series targets the deprecated GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW as only a few users
> left. Convert those users to call modern APIs and drop this legacy piece
> from the source tree.
>
> The idea is to route this via GPIO tree, please Ack.
Thank you for Acks, folks!
Dominik, is it possible to get yours or are you inactive nowadays (I saw
last mention of your name ca. 2023).
Bart, we have all Acks except pcmcia (see also above), and the change is
the same all over the places, do you think it's okay to apply if Dominik
won't respond for a few days?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists