linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: marvell: Drop undocumented SATA phy names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKfpVVVh6L0PLmieBO3qMFpcDfWFwd+5=qzH_MbeZt31Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:39:50 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: marvell: Drop undocumented SATA phy names

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:34 PM Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de> wrote:
>
> Am 5. November 2024 17:28:57 MEZ schrieb Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>:
> >"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> >> While "phy-names" is allowed for sata-port nodes, the names used aren't
> >> documented and are incorrect ("sata-phy" is what's documented). The name
> >> for a single entry is fairly useless, so just drop the property.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> >Applied on mvebu/dt64
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Gregory
> >> ---
> >> Cc: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
> >>
> >> There's also this 2 year old patch fixing other SATA errors[1] which
> >> was never picked up. :(
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220311210357.222830-3-linux@fw-web.de/
>
> Hi
>
> How to deal with my patch pointed by rob?

I believe it will conflict with mine. Can you rebase on top of
mvebu/dt64 and resend it.

Rob