[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d58b37ec-ae72-4009-b2ed-fbb6b8e84704@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 16:27:02 +0530
From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Odelu Kukatla
<quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add EPSS L3 compatible
for SA8775P
On 11/4/2024 3:05 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4.11.2024 7:40 AM, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/1/2024 12:26 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:23:57PM +0530, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/26/2024 8:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:30:56PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>>>>>> Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider binding on
>>>>>> SA8775P SoCs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>>>>> index 21dae0b92819..042ca44c32ec 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ properties:
>>>>>> - qcom,sm8250-epss-l3
>>>>>> - qcom,sm8350-epss-l3
>>>>>> - const: qcom,epss-l3
>>>>>> + - items:
>>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>>> + - qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3
>>>>>> + - const: qcom,epss-l3-perf
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is it -perf? What's so different about it?
>>>>
>>>> The EPSS instance in SA8775P uses PERF_STATE register instead of REG_L3_VOTE to scale L3 clocks.
>>>> So adding new generic compatible "qcom,epss-l3-perf" for PERF_STATE register based l3 scaling.
>>>
>>> Neither sm8250 nor sc7280 use this compatible, while they also use
>>> PERF_STATE register.
>>>
>> That is correct, both sm8250 and sc7280 use perf state register.
>> The intention for adding "qcom,epss-l3-perf" generic compatible is to use it for the chipsets which use perf state register for l3 scaling.
>> Using generic compatible avoids the need for adding chipset specific compatible in match table.
>
> That is exactly what bindings guidelines forbid.
>
> You need a SoC-specific compatible so that you can address platform-
> specific quirks that may arise in the future while keeping backwards
> compatibility with older device trees
>
> Konrad
Got it, I will add both SoC-Specific and generic compatibles in the driver match table in next patch revision.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists