linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add GPU clocks for QCS8300

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36f2ng6bdovp63xmojrs4sxmbwnapl6oo2isehmiiuh6xl2les@7nfpou4ppkp7>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:57:29 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, 
	Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add GPU clocks for
 QCS8300

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:21:56PM +0530, Imran Shaik wrote:
> The QCS8300 GPU clock controller is mostly identical to SA8775P, but
> QCS8300 has few additional clocks and minor differences. Hence, reuse
> SA8775P gpucc bindings and add additional clocks required for QCS8300.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml |  3 +++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs8300-gpucc.h          | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 

That's a bit unusual, I think none of other SoCs do it. Last time you
brought existing example which used the same header and prefixes.

Anyway, it's fine from DT point of view, if that's what SoC/clock
maintainers want so:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof