[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2411071534110.20286@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:34:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
cc: lee@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, bentiss@...nel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz, ukleinek@...ian.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] HID: hid-sensor-hub: don't use stale platform-data
on remove
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
> the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
> sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
>
> So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
> build errors.
Ah, right.
> But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
> mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
> depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
OK, I am keeping my hands off it for the time being.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists