[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112143732.GG8552@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:37:32 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, jic23@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, bentiss@...nel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz, ukleinek@...ian.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] HID: hid-sensor-hub: don't use stale
platform-data on remove
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>
> > This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
> > the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
> > sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
> >
> > So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
> > build errors.
>
> Ah, right.
>
> > But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
> > mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
> > depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
>
> OK, I am keeping my hands off it for the time being.
I can take it now with an Ack.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists