[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241211120844.GD7139@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:17:18 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, jic23@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, bentiss@...nel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz, ukleinek@...ian.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] HID: hid-sensor-hub: don't use stale
platform-data on remove
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2024, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >
> > > This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
> > > the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
> > > sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
> > >
> > > So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
> > > build errors.
> >
> > Ah, right.
> >
> > > But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
> > > mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
> > > depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
> >
> > OK, I am keeping my hands off it for the time being.
>
> I can take it now with an Ack.
Looking to apply this set now.
Ack please.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists