[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <n914pn7o-pr9n-5ss0-p744-73402nnn843p@xreary.bet>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:24:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, jic23@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
bentiss@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz,
ukleinek@...ian.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] HID: hid-sensor-hub: don't use stale platform-data
on remove
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
> > > > the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
> > > > sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
> > > >
> > > > So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
> > > > build errors.
> > >
> > > Ah, right.
> > >
> > > > But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
> > > > mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
> > > > depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
> > >
> > > OK, I am keeping my hands off it for the time being.
> >
> > I can take it now with an Ack.
>
> Looking to apply this set now.
>
> Ack please.
I'd preferer if Srinivas could ack this as the more specific maintainer.
Srinivas, please?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists