[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3196449.TQGk6oTFT5@diego>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:01:48 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, bentiss@...nel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, pavel@....cz, ukleinek@...ian.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] HID: hid-sensor-hub: don't use stale platform-data on
remove
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024, 13:24:42 CET schrieb Jiri Kosina:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > > This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
> > > > > the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
> > > > > sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
> > > > >
> > > > > So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
> > > > > build errors.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, right.
> > > >
> > > > > But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
> > > > > mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
> > > > > depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
> > > >
> > > > OK, I am keeping my hands off it for the time being.
> > >
> > > I can take it now with an Ack.
> >
> > Looking to apply this set now.
> >
> > Ack please.
>
> I'd preferer if Srinivas could ack this as the more specific maintainer.
> Srinivas, please?
The patch already includes the
Ack from Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
from a previous version, so I guess it should be ok already?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists