lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez0bv_y1k3cqMCsj0sJGPR4iK9zmHTa6124+N6i+s4+bTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:35:38 +0100
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: david@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de, 
	muchun.song@...ux.dev, vbabka@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
	zokeefe@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com, 
	catalin.marinas@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: pgtable: try to reclaim empty PTE page in madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 9:14 AM Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> As a first step, this commit aims to synchronously free the empty PTE
> pages in madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) case. We will detect and free empty PTE
> pages in zap_pte_range(), and will add zap_details.reclaim_pt to exclude
> cases other than madvise(MADV_DONTNEED).
>
> Once an empty PTE is detected, we first try to hold the pmd lock within
> the pte lock. If successful, we clear the pmd entry directly (fast path).
> Otherwise, we wait until the pte lock is released, then re-hold the pmd
> and pte locks and loop PTRS_PER_PTE times to check pte_none() to re-detect
> whether the PTE page is empty and free it (slow path).

How does this interact with move_pages_pte()? I am looking at your
series applied on top of next-20241106, and it looks to me like
move_pages_pte() uses pte_offset_map_rw_nolock() and assumes that the
PMD entry can't change. You can clearly see this assumption at the
WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_none(*dst_pmd)). And if we race the wrong way, I
think for example move_present_pte() can end up moving a present PTE
into a page table that has already been scheduled for RCU freeing.

> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |  1 +
>  mm/Kconfig         | 15 ++++++++++
>  mm/Makefile        |  1 +
>  mm/internal.h      | 23 ++++++++++++++++
>  mm/madvise.c       |  4 ++-
>  mm/memory.c        | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  mm/pt_reclaim.c    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 mm/pt_reclaim.c
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 3e4bb43035953..ce3936590fe72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2319,6 +2319,7 @@ extern void pagefault_out_of_memory(void);
>  struct zap_details {
>         struct folio *single_folio;     /* Locked folio to be unmapped */
>         bool even_cows;                 /* Zap COWed private pages too? */
> +       bool reclaim_pt;                /* Need reclaim page tables? */
>         zap_flags_t zap_flags;          /* Extra flags for zapping */
>  };
>
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 84000b0168086..681909e0a9fa3 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -1301,6 +1301,21 @@ config ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
>           The architecture has hardware support for userspace shadow call
>            stacks (eg, x86 CET, arm64 GCS or RISC-V Zicfiss).
>
> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM
> +       def_bool n
> +
> +config PT_RECLAIM
> +       bool "reclaim empty user page table pages"
> +       default y
> +       depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM && MMU && SMP
> +       select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> +       help
> +         Try to reclaim empty user page table pages in paths other that munmap

nit: s/other that/other than/

> +         and exit_mmap path.
> +
> +         Note: now only empty user PTE page table pages will be reclaimed.
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 0ceae57da7dad..ee88652761d45 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -851,7 +851,9 @@ static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  static long madvise_dontneed_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                                         unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
> -       zap_page_range_single(vma, start, end - start, NULL);
> +       struct zap_details details = {.reclaim_pt = true,};
> +
> +       zap_page_range_single(vma, start, end - start, &details);
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 002aa4f454fa0..c4a8c18fbcfd7 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
>  static inline bool should_zap_cows(struct zap_details *details)
>  {
>         /* By default, zap all pages */
> -       if (!details)
> +       if (!details || details->reclaim_pt)
>                 return true;
>
>         /* Or, we zap COWed pages only if the caller wants to */

This looks hacky - when we have a "details" object, its ->even_cows
member is supposed to indicate whether COW pages should be zapped. So
please instead set .even_cows=true in madvise_dontneed_single_vma().

> @@ -1678,6 +1678,30 @@ static inline int do_zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>                                          details, rss);
>  }
>
> +static inline int count_pte_none(pte_t *pte, int nr)
> +{
> +       int none_nr = 0;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP is enabled, the uffd-wp PTEs may be
> +        * re-installed, so we need to check pte_none() one by one.
> +        * Otherwise, checking a single PTE in a batch is sufficient.
> +        */

Please also add a comment noting that count_pte_none() relies on this
invariant on top of do_zap_pte_range() or somewhere like that.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP
> +       for (;;) {
> +               if (pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
> +                       none_nr++;
> +               if (--nr == 0)
> +                       break;
> +               pte++;
> +       }
> +#else
> +       if (pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
> +               none_nr = nr;
> +#endif
> +       return none_nr;
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>                                 struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>                                 unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> @@ -1689,8 +1713,16 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>         spinlock_t *ptl;
>         pte_t *start_pte;
>         pte_t *pte;
> +       pmd_t pmdval;
> +       bool can_reclaim_pt = false;
> +       bool direct_reclaim = false;
> +       unsigned long start = addr;
> +       int none_nr = 0;
>         int nr;
>
> +       if (details && details->reclaim_pt && (end - start >= PMD_SIZE))
> +               can_reclaim_pt = true;
> +
>  retry:
>         tlb_change_page_size(tlb, PAGE_SIZE);
>         init_rss_vec(rss);
> @@ -1706,12 +1738,16 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>
>                 nr = do_zap_pte_range(tlb, vma, pte, addr, end, details, rss,
>                                       &force_flush, &force_break);
> +               none_nr += count_pte_none(pte, nr);
>                 if (unlikely(force_break)) {
>                         addr += nr * PAGE_SIZE;
>                         break;
>                 }
>         } while (pte += nr, addr += PAGE_SIZE * nr, addr != end);
>
> +       if (addr == end && can_reclaim_pt && (none_nr == PTRS_PER_PTE))
> +               direct_reclaim = try_get_and_clear_pmd(mm, pmd, &pmdval);
> +
>         add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
>         arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
>
> @@ -1738,6 +1774,13 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>                 goto retry;
>         }
>
> +       if (can_reclaim_pt) {
> +               if (direct_reclaim)
> +                       free_pte(mm, start, tlb, pmdval);
> +               else
> +                       try_to_free_pte(mm, pmd, start, tlb);
> +       }
> +
>         return addr;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/mm/pt_reclaim.c b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..fc055da40b615
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/pt_reclaim.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
> +#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> +
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +bool try_get_and_clear_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t *pmdval)
> +{
> +       spinlock_t *pml = pmd_lockptr(mm, pmd);
> +
> +       if (!spin_trylock(pml))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       *pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd);
> +       pmd_clear(pmd);
> +       spin_unlock(pml);
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +void free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> +             pmd_t pmdval)
> +{
> +       pte_free_tlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr);
> +       mm_dec_nr_ptes(mm);
> +}
> +
> +void try_to_free_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> +                    struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> +{
> +       pmd_t pmdval;
> +       spinlock_t *pml, *ptl;
> +       pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
> +       int i;
> +

If you swap the following two operations around (first pmd_lock(),
then pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(), then take the PTE lock):

> +       start_pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, &pmdval, &ptl);
> +       if (!start_pte)
> +               return;
> +
> +       pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
> +       if (ptl != pml)
> +               spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +

Then I think this check can go away:

> +       if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmdval, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd))))
> +               goto out_ptl;
> +
> +       /* Check if it is empty PTE page */
> +       for (i = 0, pte = start_pte; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, pte++) {
> +               if (!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))
> +                       goto out_ptl;
> +       }
> +       pte_unmap(start_pte);
> +
> +       pmd_clear(pmd);
> +
> +       if (ptl != pml)
> +               spin_unlock(ptl);
> +       spin_unlock(pml);
> +
> +       free_pte(mm, addr, tlb, pmdval);
> +
> +       return;
> +out_ptl:
> +       pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
> +       if (pml != ptl)
> +               spin_unlock(pml);
> +}
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ