linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVXkqxyu=+H_bxazxTLT8UBJuaDpctEcChRbTyXATPm1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 08:34:31 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, 
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Luis Felipe Hernandez <luis.hernandez093@...il.com>, 
	quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, macro@...am.me.uk, tpiepho@...il.com, 
	ricardo@...liere.net, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, 
	Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > > v6.12-rc1"[1].  Of course the proper way forward would be to add
> > > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" to all tests that still lack it, so I can
> > > just never queue that patch ;-)
> >
> > What's the status of this series? I am asking because I am wondering if
> > I should queue [1] for v6.13, or just drop it, and send a patch to add
> > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" instead.
> >
> > I saw the email from Andrew stating he applied it to his tree[2],
> > but that seems to have been dropped silently, and never made it into
> > linux-next?
>
> Yes, sorry.  Believe it or not, I do try to avoid spraying out too many
> emails.  David will recall better than I, but things got messy.
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009162719.0adaea37@canb.auug.org.au was
> perhaps the cause.

Fair enough.

> I'm sure David can being us up to date.

Probably the best solution is to respin after v6.13-rc1, to be included
in v6.13-rc2.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds