linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241106131718.e0899c324941f63dc931f0fc@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:17:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell
 <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Luis Felipe Hernandez
 <luis.hernandez093@...il.com>, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com,
 macro@...am.me.uk, tpiepho@...il.com, ricardo@...liere.net,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, Nicolas Pitre
 <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] lib: math: Move kunit tests into tests/ subdir

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for
> > v6.12-rc1"[1].  Of course the proper way forward would be to add
> > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" to all tests that still lack it, so I can
> > just never queue that patch ;-)
> 
> What's the status of this series? I am asking because I am wondering if
> I should queue [1] for v6.13, or just drop it, and send a patch to add
> "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" instead.
> 
> I saw the email from Andrew stating he applied it to his tree[2],
> but that seems to have been dropped silently, and never made it into
> linux-next?

Yes, sorry.  Believe it or not, I do try to avoid spraying out too many
emails.  David will recall better than I, but things got messy. 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009162719.0adaea37@canb.auug.org.au was
perhaps the cause.

I'm sure David can being us up to date.