[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyyEbCKxjkVFXUMB@test-OptiPlex-Tower-Plus-7010>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:42:12 +0530
From: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
CC: <claudiu.manoil@....com>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1
On 2024-11-07 at 09:08:12, Wei Fang (wei.fang@....com) wrote:
> Compared to ENETC v1 (LS1028A), ENETC v4 (i.MX95) adds more features, and
> some features are configured completely differently from v1. In order to
> more fully support ENETC v4, these features will be added through several
> rounds of patch sets. This round adds these features, such as Tx and Rx
> checksum offload, increase maximum chained Tx BD number and Large send
> offload (LSO).
>
> Wei Fang (5):
> net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
> net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
> net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number for i.MX95 ENETC
> net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
> net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support
>
Can you refactor the patches in a way that "ndev->hw_features" set
in corresponding patch.
Setting NETIF_F_HW_CSUM in "net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload
support" does not look good to me.
Thanks,
Hariprasad k
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 345 ++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 32 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h | 22 ++
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h | 31 +-
> .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 16 +-
> .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c | 7 +-
> 6 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists