[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyyImAlkcpTHlszJ@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:30:00 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dyoung@...hat.com, daniel.kiper@...cle.com, noodles@...com,
lijiang@...hat.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: rename the confusing local variable in
early_memremap_is_setup_data()
On 11/06/24 at 12:20pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Ok, I'll take your 2/2 next week and you can then send the cleanup ontop.
>
> OMG what a mess this is. Please test the below before I apply it.
Just got a machine and building kernel, will report here when testing is
done.
>
> Then, when you do the cleanup, do the following:
>
> - merge early_memremap_is_setup_data() with memremap_is_setup_data() into
> a common __memremap_is_setup_data() and then add a bool early which
> determines which memremap variant is called.
>
> - unify the @size argument by dropping it and using a function local size.
> What we have there now is the definition of bitrot. :-\
>
> - replace all sizeof(*data), sizeof(struct setup_data) with a macro definition
> above the functions to unify it properly.
>
> What an ugly mess... :-\
Will clean them all up as suggested. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists