[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hcEn_XhBPLstFyvqE=2iCG51wvcbGHf2nKaFJU5ynytQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:55:41 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liuyonglong@...wei.com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Fix fail to load module
on platform without _PMD method
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:37 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> As ACPI spec said, _PMD method is optional. The acpi_power_meter
> shouldn't fail to load when the platform hasn't _PMD method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
How exactly is this related to the first patch?
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> index 6c8a9c863528..2f1c9d97ad21 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
> @@ -680,8 +680,9 @@ static int setup_attrs(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
> {
> int res = 0;
>
> + /* _PMD method is optional. */
> res = read_domain_devices(resource);
> - if (res)
> + if (res != -ENODEV)
> return res;
>
> if (resource->caps.flags & POWER_METER_CAN_MEASURE) {
> --
> 2.22.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists