[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccf33114-4ccd-ed2e-cdbf-84de8525911a@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:07:48 +0800
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<liuyonglong@...wei.com>, <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] hwmon: (acpi_power_meter) Fix fail to load module
on platform without _PMD method
在 2024/11/7 18:55, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:37 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com> wrote:
>> As ACPI spec said, _PMD method is optional. The acpi_power_meter
>> shouldn't fail to load when the platform hasn't _PMD method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
> How exactly is this related to the first patch?
They're not related, they're just similar.
Sorry, I should separate them😂
Should I resend them now?
>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> index 6c8a9c863528..2f1c9d97ad21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/acpi_power_meter.c
>> @@ -680,8 +680,9 @@ static int setup_attrs(struct acpi_power_meter_resource *resource)
>> {
>> int res = 0;
>>
>> + /* _PMD method is optional. */
>> res = read_domain_devices(resource);
>> - if (res)
>> + if (res != -ENODEV)
>> return res;
>>
>> if (resource->caps.flags & POWER_METER_CAN_MEASURE) {
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>>
>>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists