[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zy4xHC3MCtAqlSxy@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:41:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] x86/cpu: Make sure flag_is_changeable_p() is
always being used
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 04:35:17PM +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On November 8, 2024 4:30:10 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >See also commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static
> >inline functions for W=1 build").
^^^ (1)
> Looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>
Thank you!
> But another question: why the hell does clang complain about an unused static inline function?!
Does (1) shed a bit of light to this?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists