[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvojHH-wmbieqgtVyc7pGWQ0gyrzkWdtUkLpSyreub1uk_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 08:21:30 -0800
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf trace: avoid garbage when not printing a
syscall's arguments
Hello,
This patch solves the garbage output problem I got, and your test can be run.
Thanks,
Howard
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:21 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com> wrote:
>
> syscall__scnprintf_args may not place anything in the output buffer
> (e.g., because the arguments are all zero). If that happened in
> trace__fprintf_sys_enter, its fprintf would receive an unitialized
> buffer leading to garbage output.
>
> Fix the problem by passing the (possibly zero) bounds of the argument
> buffer to the output fprintf.
>
> Fixes: a98392bb1e169 ("perf trace: Use beautifiers on syscalls:sys_enter_ handlers")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index f6179b13b8b4..28f61d10a2f8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -2702,6 +2702,7 @@ static int trace__fprintf_sys_enter(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
> char msg[1024];
> void *args, *augmented_args = NULL;
> int augmented_args_size;
> + size_t printed = 0;
>
> if (sc == NULL)
> return -1;
> @@ -2717,8 +2718,8 @@ static int trace__fprintf_sys_enter(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
>
> args = perf_evsel__sc_tp_ptr(evsel, args, sample);
> augmented_args = syscall__augmented_args(sc, sample, &augmented_args_size, trace->raw_augmented_syscalls_args_size);
> - syscall__scnprintf_args(sc, msg, sizeof(msg), args, augmented_args, augmented_args_size, trace, thread);
> - fprintf(trace->output, "%s", msg);
> + printed += syscall__scnprintf_args(sc, msg, sizeof(msg), args, augmented_args, augmented_args_size, trace, thread);
> + fprintf(trace->output, "%.*s", (int)printed, msg);
> err = 0;
> out_put:
> thread__put(thread);
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists