[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzZm5XbY4ddalbWr@x1>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:08:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf trace: avoid garbage when not printing a
syscall's arguments
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:21:30AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch solves the garbage output problem I got, and your test can be run.
I'm taking this as a Tested-by you, ok?
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Howard
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:21 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com> wrote:
> >
> > syscall__scnprintf_args may not place anything in the output buffer
> > (e.g., because the arguments are all zero). If that happened in
> > trace__fprintf_sys_enter, its fprintf would receive an unitialized
> > buffer leading to garbage output.
> >
> > Fix the problem by passing the (possibly zero) bounds of the argument
> > buffer to the output fprintf.
> >
> > Fixes: a98392bb1e169 ("perf trace: Use beautifiers on syscalls:sys_enter_ handlers")
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@...flow.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index f6179b13b8b4..28f61d10a2f8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -2702,6 +2702,7 @@ static int trace__fprintf_sys_enter(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
> > char msg[1024];
> > void *args, *augmented_args = NULL;
> > int augmented_args_size;
> > + size_t printed = 0;
> >
> > if (sc == NULL)
> > return -1;
> > @@ -2717,8 +2718,8 @@ static int trace__fprintf_sys_enter(struct trace *trace, struct evsel *evsel,
> >
> > args = perf_evsel__sc_tp_ptr(evsel, args, sample);
> > augmented_args = syscall__augmented_args(sc, sample, &augmented_args_size, trace->raw_augmented_syscalls_args_size);
> > - syscall__scnprintf_args(sc, msg, sizeof(msg), args, augmented_args, augmented_args_size, trace, thread);
> > - fprintf(trace->output, "%s", msg);
> > + printed += syscall__scnprintf_args(sc, msg, sizeof(msg), args, augmented_args, augmented_args_size, trace, thread);
> > + fprintf(trace->output, "%.*s", (int)printed, msg);
> > err = 0;
> > out_put:
> > thread__put(thread);
> > --
> > 2.39.5
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists