[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jh68i2itz.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 10:08:56 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Chuan Liu
<chuan.liu@...ogic.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the clk tree
On Fri 08 Nov 2024 at 08:09, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
> 5e052ef3c400 ("clk: meson: s4: pll: fix frac maximum value for hifi_pll")
>
> Fixes tag
>
> Fixes: 80344f4c1a1e ("clk: meson: s4: pll: hifi_pll support fractional multiplier")
>
> has these problem(s):
>
> - Target SHA1 does not exist
>
> Maybe you meant
>
> Fixes: eb61a1264990 ("clk: meson: s4: pll: hifi_pll support fractional multiplier")
Indeed, I missed this. Thanks for pointing it out Stephen.
Stephen (Boyd), how do you want to handle this ? The commit will need
amending and it's something you've already pulled unfortunately. I'm
happy to redo amlogic clock update tag, if that's easier for you.
Stephen (Rothwell), I suppose (and hope) you are not checking all those
commit tags manually. Is there something available somewhere I should have
added to my routine checks for this type mistake ? A checkpatch.pl flag
I missed maybe ?
--
Jerome
Powered by blists - more mailing lists