linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] serial: sh-sci: Check if TX data was written to device in .tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <530f4a8e-b71a-4db1-a2cc-df1fcfa132ec@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:57:22 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, geert+renesas@...der.be,
 magnus.damm@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, g.liakhovetski@....de,
 lethal@...ux-sh.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] serial: sh-sci: Check if TX data was written to
 device in .tx_empty()

On 08. 11. 24, 11:05, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> 
> On the Renesas RZ/G3S, when doing suspend to RAM, the uart_suspend_port()
> is called. The uart_suspend_port() calls 3 times the
> struct uart_port::ops::tx_empty() before shutting down the port.
> 
> According to the documentation, the struct uart_port::ops::tx_empty()
> API tests whether the transmitter FIFO and shifter for the port is
> empty.
> 
> The Renesas RZ/G3S SCIFA IP reports the number of data units stored in the
> transmit FIFO through the FDR (FIFO Data Count Register). The data units
> in the FIFOs are written in the shift register and transmitted from there.
> The TEND bit in the Serial Status Register reports if the data was
> transmitted from the shift register.
> 
> In the previous code, in the tx_empty() API implemented by the sh-sci
> driver, it is considered that the TX is empty if the hardware reports the
> TEND bit set and the number of data units in the FIFO is zero.
> 
> According to the HW manual, the TEND bit has the following meaning:
> 
> 0: Transmission is in the waiting state or in progress.
> 1: Transmission is completed.
> 
> It has been noticed that when opening the serial device w/o using it and
> then switch to a power saving mode, the tx_empty() call in the
> uart_port_suspend() function fails, leading to the "Unable to drain
> transmitter" message being printed on the console. This is because the
> TEND=0 if nothing has been transmitted and the FIFOs are empty. As the
> TEND=0 has double meaning (waiting state, in progress) we can't
> determined the scenario described above.
> 
> Add a software workaround for this. This sets a variable if any data has
> been sent on the serial console (when using PIO) or if the DMA callback has
> been called (meaning something has been transmitted).
> 
> Fixes: 73a19e4c0301 ("serial: sh-sci: Add DMA support.")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - use bool type instead of atomic_t
> 
>   drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 11 +++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> index 136e0c257af1..65514d37bfe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct sci_port {
>   
>   	bool has_rtscts;
>   	bool autorts;
> +	bool first_time_tx;

This is a misnomer. It suggests to be set only during the first TX. What 
about ::did_tx, ::performed_tx, ::transmitted, or alike?

> @@ -885,6 +887,7 @@ static void sci_transmit_chars(struct uart_port *port)
>   		}
>   
>   		sci_serial_out(port, SCxTDR, c);
> +		s->first_time_tx = true;
>   
>   		port->icount.tx++;
>   	} while (--count > 0);
> @@ -1241,6 +1244,8 @@ static void sci_dma_tx_complete(void *arg)
>   	if (kfifo_len(&tport->xmit_fifo) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
>   		uart_write_wakeup(port);
>   
> +	s->first_time_tx = true;

This is too late IMO. The first in-flight dma won't be accounted in 
sci_tx_empty(). From DMA submit up to now.

> @@ -2076,6 +2081,10 @@ static unsigned int sci_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port)
>   {
>   	unsigned short status = sci_serial_in(port, SCxSR);
>   	unsigned short in_tx_fifo = sci_txfill(port);
> +	struct sci_port *s = to_sci_port(port);
> +
> +	if (!s->first_time_tx)
> +		return TIOCSER_TEMT;

So perhaps check if there is a TX DMA running here too?

>   
>   	return (status & SCxSR_TEND(port)) && !in_tx_fifo ? TIOCSER_TEMT : 0;
>   }

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs