lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1d7a295-ad24-41c8-a431-7d6492d51097@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:07:43 +0100
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, dlustig@...dia.com,
 frederic@...nel.org, hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com,
 j.alglave@....ac.uk, joel@...lfernandes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, luc.maranget@...ia.fr, npiggin@...il.com,
 parri.andrea@...il.com, paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
 quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu, urezki@...il.com,
 will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic
 and semantic tags



Am 11/8/2024 um 11:12 AM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:10:48 +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
>> I hadn't done that before (because I thought I should not add other people's tags
>> especially if they hadn't reviewed that specific revision), so we may be missing
>> *a lot* of reviewed-by...
>>
> 
> Section "Using Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:"
> of Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst has this paragraph:
> 
>    Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester
>    or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending
>    next versions.  However if the patch has changed substantially in following
>    version, these tags might not be applicable anymore and thus should be removed.
>    Usually removal of someone's Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags should be mentioned
>    in the patch changelog (after the '---' separator).
> 
> Does this help you?

Thanks so much, it does. My apologies to everyone whose reviewed-by tag 
I failed to add :(

I should have read that more document more carefully.

Best wishes,
    jonas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ