[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad31f44044d56dda935698012c0dd595@epochal.quest>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 13:17:32 -0400
From: Cody Eksal <masterr3c0rd@...chal.quest>
To: wens@...e.org
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel
Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Parthiban <parthiban@...umiz.com>, Andre
Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: a100: enable MMC clock reparenting
On 2024/11/09 12:02 pm, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> You should still keep the version number from the original series if
> resending or increment it if changes were made.
Noted, sorry; still getting used to LKML norms. Since I was resubmitting just
this patch for stable, I wasn't sure what the norms were.
The contents of the patch are unchanged from my series; the only modifications
made were modifying the commit message and adding stable tags.
Thanks!
- Cody
>
> ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists