[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a171cc9-a052-452e-8b3d-273e5b46dae5@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 03:11:48 +0200
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, sd@...asysnail.net,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 05/23] ovpn: keep carrier always on
On 29.10.2024 12:47, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> An ovpn interface will keep carrier always on and let the user
> decide when an interface should be considered disconnected.
>
> This way, even if an ovpn interface is not connected to any peer,
> it can still retain all IPs and routes and thus prevent any data
> leak.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> drivers/net/ovpn/main.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> index eead7677b8239eb3c48bb26ca95492d88512b8d4..eaa83a8662e4ac2c758201008268f9633643c0b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ static void ovpn_struct_free(struct net_device *net)
>
> static int ovpn_net_open(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> + /* ovpn keeps the carrier always on to avoid losing IP or route
> + * configuration upon disconnection. This way it can prevent leaks
> + * of traffic outside of the VPN tunnel.
> + * The user may override this behaviour by tearing down the interface
> + * manually.
> + */
> + netif_carrier_on(dev);
If a user cares about the traffic leaking, then he can create a
blackhole route with huge metric:
# ip route add blackhole default metric 10000
Why the network interface should implicitly provide this functionality?
And on another hand, how a routing daemon can learn a topology change
without indication from the interface?
> netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists