lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241109011249.GA549125@google.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 10:12:49 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: fix NULL pointer in comp_algorithm_show()

On (24/11/08 18:01), Liu Shixin wrote:
> LTP reported a NULL pointer dereference as followed:
> 
>  CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 5995 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6+ #3
>  Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>  pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>  pc : __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140
>  lr : zcomp_available_show+0x60/0x100 [zram]
>  sp : ffff800088b93b90
>  x29: ffff800088b93b90 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000400cc0
>  x26: 0000000000000ffe x25: ffff80007b3e2388 x24: 0000000000000000
>  x23: ffff80007b3e2390 x22: ffff0004041a9000 x21: ffff80007b3e2900
>  x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
>  x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
>  x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
>  x11: 0000000000000000 x10: ffff80007b3e2900 x9 : ffff80007b3cb280
>  x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000
>  x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00656c722d6f7a6c
>  x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff80007b3e2900 x0 : 0000000000000000
>  Call trace:
>   __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140
>   comp_algorithm_show+0x40/0x70 [zram]
>   dev_attr_show+0x28/0x80
>   sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x90/0x140
>   kernfs_seq_show+0x34/0x48
>   seq_read_iter+0x1d4/0x4e8
>   kernfs_fop_read_iter+0x40/0x58
>   new_sync_read+0x9c/0x168
>   vfs_read+0x1a8/0x1f8
>   ksys_read+0x74/0x108
>   __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x38
>   invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
>   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
>   do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>   el0_svc+0x38/0x138
>   el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc8
>   el0t_64_sync+0x188/0x190

The explanation below is more than enough, I think this stack trace
doesn't really show anything new or interesting.

> The zram->comp_algs[ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP] can be NULL in zram_add() if
> comp_algorithm_set() has not been called. User can access the zram device
> by sysfs after device_add_disk(), so there is a time window to trigger
> the NULL pointer dereference. Move it ahead device_add_disk() to make sure
> when user can access the zram device, it is ready. comp_algorithm_set() is
> protected by zram->init_lock in other places and no such problem.
> 
> Fixes: 7ac07a26dea7 ("zram: preparation for multi-zcomp support")

So I think this fixes something much older, probably around e46b8a030d76d
time (2014).

> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ