[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241110125814.1899076-1-karprzy7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:58:13 +0100
From: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@...il.com>
To: hverkuil@...all.nl,
mchehab@...nel.org
Cc: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] media: cec: extron-da-hd-4k-plus: add return check for wait_for_completion*()
According to scheduler/completion.rst, return status of wait_for_completion*()
function variants should be checked or be accompanied by explanation.
I examined code in extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c and it does look like the return value
should be checked, but perhaps there is a reason for ignoring it.
I drafted a patch for this, but I'm not entirely sure how to approach error handling in this case.
Discovered in coverity, CID1599679
Signed-off-by: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@...il.com>
---
.../cec/usb/extron-da-hd-4k-plus/extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/usb/extron-da-hd-4k-plus/extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c b/drivers/media/cec/usb/extron-da-hd-4k-plus/extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c
index cfbfc4c1b2e6..83a790117411 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/usb/extron-da-hd-4k-plus/extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/usb/extron-da-hd-4k-plus/extron-da-hd-4k-plus.c
@@ -559,9 +559,12 @@ static void extron_read_edid(struct extron_port *port)
extron->edid_reading = true;
- if (!extron_send_and_wait(extron, port, cmd, reply))
- wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&extron->edid_completion,
+ if (!extron_send_and_wait(extron, port, cmd, reply)) {
+ ret = wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&extron->edid_completion,
msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
if (port->edid_blocks) {
extron_parse_edid(port);
port->read_edid = true;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists