[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8459A924A74FE917897F9F5288592@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:09:19 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drivers: core: clear wake irq in device_unbind_cleanup
Hi Greg
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: core: clear wake irq in
> device_unbind_cleanup
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:21:30PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > With dev_pm_clear_wake_irq in device_unbind_cleanup, there is no
> need
> > to invoke dev_pm_clear_wake_irq in driver remove hook explicitly.
> >
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c index
> > f0e4b4aba885..ea3a871bdd11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > #include <linux/wait.h>
> > #include <linux/async.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> > #include <linux/pinctrl/devinfo.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > @@ -556,6 +557,7 @@ static void device_unbind_cleanup(struct
> device *dev)
> > dev->pm_domain->dismiss(dev);
> > pm_runtime_reinit(dev);
> > dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev, 0);
> > + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
>
> I don't understand, you say you don't need to invoke it, yet you are
> calling it here.
I mean not need to invoke it in driver.remove hook. With this patch, we
could remove
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11.7/source/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c#L498
and same to other drivers.
>
> What commit id does this fix?
I am thinking to take this as a improvement, with core code
has this, the various drivers no need explicitly invoke it
in their own driver remove hook.
And what bug is this resolving? What
> drivers are broken without this?
See here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZymxvLMkkktRoCXZ@google.com/
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists