[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55914c2a-95d8-4c40-a3ea-dfa6b2aeb1dd@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 03:51:47 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sagar Cheluvegowda <quic_scheluve@...cinc.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Enable support for XGMAC
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 06:08:10PM -0800, Sagar Cheluvegowda wrote:
> All Qualcomm platforms have only supported EMAC version 4 until
> now whereas in future we will also be supporting XGMAC version
> which has higher capabilities than its peer. As both has_gmac4
> and has_xgmac fields cannot co-exist, make sure to disable the
> former flag when has_xgmac is enabled.
If you say they are mutually exclusive, how can it happen that both
are enabled?
To me, this feels like you are papering over a bug somewhere else.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists