[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mGzd-Y7b2DVczagfpNR7Uky6iNx+8dUU4g27e3O+GJjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:40:04 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] rust: xarray: Add an abstraction for XArray
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:22 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like there are merge conflicts between v6.13 and rust-next.
> What's the usual process for resolution?
You can take a look, for instance, at how it was done in linux-next.
(Nit: mainline is not yet v6.13)
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists