[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AM6PR03MB5080BCAC62436057A03B334499202@AM6PR03MB5080.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:40:12 +0000
From: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com, snorcht@...il.com,
brauner@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add open-coded style process file
iterator and bpf_fget_task() kfunc
I noticed that the path_d_path_kfunc_non_lsm test case failed in BPF CI,
I will fix it in the next version.
But before that, I would like to get some feedback. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists