[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0868a2b6-5b1c-4cdd-9f87-808b4a00914e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:51:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@....nxp.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>, Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@...hat.com>,
Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@...hat.com>, Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] pinctrl: s32: convert the driver into an mfd cell
On 19/11/2024 10:57, Andrei Stefanescu wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>>> + if (npins < 0)
>>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
>>> + "Failed to read 'pinmux' in node %s\n",
>>> + grp->data.name);
>>
>> I do not see how this change is related. Looks you are mixing cleanups
>> with refactoring into MFD cell. These are two different things.
>
> Yes, I also included some small refactoring changes. I didn't think they were
> important enough to include them in a separate commit. Would you like me to separate
> them in another commit?
You cannot include such changes along other, meaningful changes. This
does not apply to this patch only but all contributions. There is a
clear policy how cleanups, bugs and new things are being upstreamed:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L168
Please read above document very carefully. This is v6 and we still
circle around absolute basics.
>
>>> - if (mem_regions == 0 || mem_regions >= 10000) {
>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "mem_regions is invalid: %u\n", mem_regions);
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> - }
>>> + /* one MSCR and one IMCR region per SIUL2 module */
>>
>> How is this related to converion into MFD cell?
>
> We no longer parse the device tree to configure the regmaps, we instead
> get them from the mfd driver. This is the main point of converting this
> driver into an mfd cell.
>
>>
>> Still looks like an ABI break.
>>
>
> Yes, the driver no longer adheres to the nxp,s32g2-siul2-pinctrl.yaml binding.
I did not find in commit msg explanation that this is ABI break and why
it is allowed. I asked for it.
>
> The intention is to deprecate that binding since it doesn't correctly describe
> the hardware. I am not sure on how to do this. I thought that changing this
> driver and removing the old compatible would be enough.
No, you cannot break the ABI. Either you deprecate this or just don't touch.
>
> Would it be better to add another file which would contain the old probing
> function(and match the old binding) so clients would be able to select the
> old implementation?
I don't understand that. Your driver is supposed to keep ABI. Not
through some selection but just as is.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists