[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e55a403-eb1c-4369-8180-1639b50cc9b1@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:07:24 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Radu Sabau <radu.sabau@...log.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add bindings for
adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800
On 11/20/24 09:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/11/2024 18:11, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:58:25AM +0800, Cedric Encarnacion wrote:
>>> add dt-bindings for adp1051, adp1055, and ltp8800 pmbus.
>>> ADP1051: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Temperature
>>> ADP1055: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Power, Temperature
>>> LTP8800-1A/-2/-4A: 150A/135A/200A DC/DC µModule Regulator
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>
>>
>> Why did you drop my ack?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241106-linoleum-kebab-decf14f54f76@spud/
> So that's a v2? Or v3? Then should be marked correctly. Please start
> using b4. I already asked analog.com for this in few cases. Feel free
> not to use b4 if you send correct patches, but this is not the case here.
>
In general I agree, but this is a combination of two patch series, as mentioned
in the summary. I am not sure how to use versioning in such situations. Is it
v2 of one series or v3 of the other ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists