linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add bindings for adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d907ddf-16ca-4136-b912-f571a691dc90@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:39:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
 Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Radu Sabau <radu.sabau@...log.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: (pmbus/adp1050): Add bindings for
 adp1051, adp1055 and ltp8800

On 20/11/2024 19:07, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/20/24 09:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/11/2024 18:11, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:58:25AM +0800, Cedric Encarnacion wrote:
>>>> add dt-bindings for adp1051, adp1055, and ltp8800 pmbus.
>>>>      ADP1051: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Temperature
>>>>      ADP1055: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Power, Temperature
>>>>      LTP8800-1A/-2/-4A: 150A/135A/200A DC/DC µModule Regulator
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@...log.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>
>>>
>>> Why did you drop my ack?
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241106-linoleum-kebab-decf14f54f76@spud/
>> So that's a v2? Or v3? Then should be marked correctly. Please start
>> using b4. I already asked analog.com for this in few cases. Feel free
>> not to use b4 if you send correct patches, but this is not the case here.
>>
> 
> In general I agree, but this is a combination of two patch series, as mentioned
> in the summary. I am not sure how to use versioning in such situations. Is it
> v2 of one series or v3 of the other ?
I would say the highest and keep the b4 changeset. This allows to use b4
diff easily. Choice done here - v1, no usage of b4  - breaks everything,
look:

b4 diff '<20241120035826.3920-1-cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>'
Grabbing thread from
lore.kernel.org/all/20241120035826.3920-1-cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com/t.mbox.gz
---
Analyzing 13 messages in the thread
Could not find lower series to compare against.


Best regards,
Krzysztof