linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: Add WWAN sahara port type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fbb61e9f-ad1f-b56d-3322-b1bac5746c62@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:48:43 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
        Jerry Meng
	<jerry.meng.lk@...ctel.com>, <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: Add WWAN sahara port type

On 11/20/2024 1:36 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> +Manivannan
> 
> Hello Jerry,
> 
> this version looks a way better, still there is one minor thing to 
> improve. See below.
> 
> Manivannan, Loic, could you advice is it Ok to export that SAHARA port 
> as is?

I'm against this.

There is an in-kernel Sahara implementation, which is going to be used 
by QDU100.  If WWAN is going to own the "SAHARA" MHI channel name, then 
no one else can use it which will conflict with QDU100.

I expect the in-kernel implementation can be leveraged for this.

-Jeff