[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zz786zZljAy2J5i7@wunner.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:27:07 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com, naveen@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: hotplug: Add a generic RAS tracepoint for
hotplug event
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 08:43:28PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> $ echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/hotplug/pci_hp_event/enable
^^^^^^^
I think this should now be "pci_hotplug" because you've renamed the
TRACE_SYSTEM in v3.
I'm wondering if we'll have other categories besides "pci_hp_event"
below "pci_hotplug". Maybe not. Is it possible to omit the "pci_hotplug"
and make "pci_hp_event" top level? Or should this be grouped below "pci"
instead of "pci_hotplug"? I'm somewhat at a loss here as I'm not
familiar with the conventions used in the tracing subsystem.
>From a PCI hotplug perspective, this patch LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists