[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b8351f6-39bb-4312-b3ff-000eb1f1fe90@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:55:04 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+c317c107c68f8bc257d9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] BUG: Bad page state in iomap_write_begin
On 21.11.24 10:46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.11.24 10:26, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.11.24 09:37, syzbot wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>>
>>> HEAD commit: e8bdb3c8be08 Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-6.12-rc8' of git:/..
>>> git tree: upstream
>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1644d2c0580000
>>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d2aeec8c0b2e420c
>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c317c107c68f8bc257d9
>>> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1144d2c0580000
>>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=176252e8580000
>>>
>>> Downloadable assets:
>>> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-e8bdb3c8.raw.xz
>>> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fcae16ff0e0f/vmlinux-e8bdb3c8.xz
>>> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/758973beace8/bzImage-e8bdb3c8.xz
>>> mounted in repro #1: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a097a300c8a9/mount_0.gz
>>> mounted in repro #2: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/36b9fff6ab5e/mount_6.gz
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+c317c107c68f8bc257d9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>>
>>> BUG: Bad page state in process syz-executor315 pfn:49e01
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x49e01
>>> head: order:0 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:-1
>>
>> So, we have a pincount underflow on a large folio (order-9). We
>> allocated the folio in iomap_write_begin()->__iomap_get_folio(). Nothing
>> special.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> </TASK>
>>> BUG: Bad page state in process syz-executor315 pfn:49e00
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x49e00
>>> head: order:0 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
>>> flags: 0x4fff0000000004d(locked|referenced|uptodate|head|node=1|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
>>> raw: 04fff0000000004d dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff0000000004d dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>>> head: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff00000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set
>>
>> And we seem to have an unexpected flag set on the head page of the same
>> large folio. Likely PG_locked.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> XFS (loop0): Unmounting Filesystem 9f1cad42-11bd-4e12-8f0b-f07876b81d9a
>>> BUG: Bad page state in process syz-executor315 pfn:49c01
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x49c01
>>> head: order:0 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:-1
>>> flags: 0x4fff0000000004d(locked|referenced|uptodate|head|node=1|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
>>> raw: 04fff00000000000 ffffea0001270001 ffffffffffffffff ffffffff00000000
>>> raw: 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff0000000004d dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>>> head: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff00000000000 ffffea0001270001 ffffffffffffffff ffffffff00000000
>>> head: 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> page dumped because: nonzero pincount
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> </TASK>
>>> BUG: Bad page state in process syz-executor315 pfn:49c00
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x49c00
>>> head: order:0 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
>>> flags: 0x4fff0000000004d(locked|referenced|uptodate|head|node=1|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
>>> raw: 04fff0000000004d dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff0000000004d dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>>> head: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 04fff00000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> head: 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>>> page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set
>>> page_owner tracks the page as allocated
>>
>> Same thing, different folio.
>>
>>
>> So we seem to be repeatedly freeing a large folio that
>> (a) Is locked
>> (b) Has a pincount underflow
>>
>> Likely because we have an unbalanced unpin, that happens before
>> evicting/truncating the folio. If we then evict/truncate the (locked)
>> folio, we free the folio before unlocking it and dropping the actual
>> last reference.
>>
>> Not sure why we see a comparable thing with small folios (pincount part
>> of refcount, but on unpin our refcount should seriously underflow
>> immediately)
>>
>> CCing David
>
> If I get the reproducer right, it does:
>
> (1) Create a temporary folder and chdir into it
>
> (2) Mounts an (XFS?) image (syz_mount_image() magic )
>
> (3) Opens a file1 in there
>
> (4) Writes some data into it using write(). Likely this allocates the
> folios.
>
> (5) Mmaps the file1 (MAP_UNINITIALIZED|MAP_LOCKED|MAP_FIXED|MAP_SHARED)
>
> (6) Creates a socket -- socket() -- and binds it -- bind().
>
> (7) Writes some more data into the mmap of file1 using memcpy.
>
> (8) Mounts another (?) image (syz_mount_image() magic )
>
> (9) Opens a file2 in there with O_SYNC|O_DIRECT|O_CREAT|O_RDWR.
>
> (10) Calls ioctl(0xc0185879) on the file2
>
> (11) Calls sendmsg() on the socket. msghdr and all data seems to reside
> completely in the mmap of file1.
>
> (12) Calls symlink(0,0)
>
> (13) Calls rename(0,0)
>
>
> I doubt 12+13 are relevant. Likely (11) is the problematic bit: we are
> performing direct-io on folios allocated during (4) from file1 into file2.
>
> I have not deciphered yet what the ioctl in (10) does.
Seems to be FITRIM.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists