lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0BDYiVaLQXaMsle@cse-cd02-lnx.ap.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:40:02 +0800
From: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konradybcio@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>, <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add SDHC1 and SDHC2

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 08:04:31AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/11/2024 07:51, Yuanjie Yang wrote:
> > Add SDHC1 and SDHC2 support to the QCS615 Ride platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 198 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > index 590beb37f441..37c6ab217c96 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > @@ -399,6 +399,65 @@ qfprom: efuse@...000 {
> >  			#size-cells = <1>;
> >  		};
> >  
> > +		sdhc_1: mmc@...000 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
> > +			reg = <0x0 0x007c4000 0x0 0x1000>,
> > +			      <0x0 0x007c5000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > +			reg-names = "hc",
> > +				    "cqhci";
> > +
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 641 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +				     <GIC_SPI 644 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			interrupt-names = "hc_irq",
> > +					  "pwr_irq";
> > +
> > +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>,
> > +				 <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> > +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> > +				 <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> > +			clock-names = "iface",
> > +				      "core",
> > +				      "xo",
> > +				      "ice";
> > +
> > +			resets = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_BCR>;
> > +
> > +			power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
> > +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x02c0 0x0>;
> > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > +					 &config_noc SLAVE_SDCC_1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr",
> > +					     "cpu-sdhc";
> > +
> > +			bus-width = <8>;
> > +			qcom,dll-config = <0x000f642c>;
> > +			qcom,ddr-config = <0x80040868>;
> > +			supports-cqe;
> > +			dma-coherent;
> > +			mmc-ddr-1_8v;
> > +			mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> > +			mmc-hs400-1_8v;
> > +			mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
> 
> These are properties of memory, not SoC. If the node is disabled, means
> memory is not attached to the SoC, right?
> 
> > +			status = "disabled";
Thanks, I think qcom,dll-config and qcom,ddr-config are properties of Soc,
they are memory configurations that need to be written to the ioaddr.
And mmc-ddr-1_8v,mmc-hs200-1_8v,mmc-hs400-1_8v are bus speed config,
they indicate the bus speed at which the host contoller can operate.
If the node is disabled, which means Soc don't support these properties.

> 
> 
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +		sdhc_2: mmc@...4000 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-sdhci","qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
> > +			reg = <0x0 0x08804000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > +			reg-names = "hc";
> > +
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 204 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +				     <GIC_SPI 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			interrupt-names = "hc_irq",
> > +					  "pwr_irq";
> > +
> > +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>,
> > +				 <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
> > +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> > +			clock-names = "iface",
> > +				      "core",
> > +				      "xo";
> > +
> > +			power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;
> > +			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
> > +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x02a0 0x0>;
> > +			resets = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_BCR>;
> > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > +					 &config_noc SLAVE_SDCC_2 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr",
> > +					     "cpu-sdhc";
> > +
> > +			bus-width = <4>;
> 
> Same comments.

Thanks, I think qcom,dll-config and qcom,ddr-config are properties of Soc,
they are memory configurations that need to be written to the ioaddr.
And mmc-ddr-1_8v,mmc-hs200-1_8v,mmc-hs400-1_8v are bus speed config,
they indicate the bus speed at which the host controller can operate.
If the node is disabled, which means Soc don't support these properties.


> > +			qcom,dll-config = <0x0007642c>;
> > +			qcom,ddr-config = <0x80040868>;
> > +			dma-coherent;
> > +			status = "disabled";
> > +
> > +			sdhc2_opp_table: opp-table {
> > +				compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > +
> > +				opp-100000000 {
> > +					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > +					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				opp-202000000 {
> > +					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
> > +					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> > +				};
> > +			};
> >  		};
> >  
> >  		dc_noc: interconnect@...0000 {
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks,
Yuanjie

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ