[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6740be7ca4bc3_2de57f2944b@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:25:16 -0600
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, "Davidlohr
Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ira
Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Huang
Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@...itsu.com>, Li Ming
<ming4.li@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cxl/core: Enable Region creation on x86 with Low
Memory Hole
Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure (CFMWS) describes zero or more Host
> Physical Address (HPA) windows that are associated with each CXL Host
> Bridge. Each window represents a contiguous HPA that may be interleaved
> with one or more targets (CXL v3.1 - 9.18.1.3).
>
> The Low Memory Hole (LMH) of x86 is a range of addresses of physical low
> memory to which systems cannot send transactions. In some cases the size
> of that hole is not compatible with the CXL hardware decoder constraint
> that the size is always aligned to 256M * Interleave Ways.
>
> On those systems, BIOS publishes CFMWS which communicate the active System
> Physical Address (SPA) ranges that map to a subset of the Host Physical
> Address (HPA) ranges. The SPA range trims out the hole, and capacity in
> the endpoint is lost with no SPA to map to CXL HPA in that hole.
>
> In the early stages of CXL Regions construction and attach on platforms
> with Low Memory Holes, cxl_add_to_region() fails and returns an error
> because it can't find any CXL Window that matches a given CXL Endpoint
> Decoder.
>
> Detect Low Memory Holes by comparing Root Decoders and Endpoint Decoders
> ranges: both must start at physical address 0 and end below 4 GB, while
> the Root Decoder ranges end at lower addresses than the matching Endpoint
> Decoders which instead must always respect the above-mentioned CXL hardware
> decoders HPA alignment constraint.
>
> Match misaligned CFMWS and CXL Regions with corresponding CXL Endpoint
> Decoders if driver detects Low Memory Holes.
>
> Construct CXL Regions with HPA range's end trimmed by matching SPA.
>
> Allow the attach target process to complete by relaxing Decoder constraints
> which would lead to failures.
>
> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
Over all this looks good but I wonder if there is a slight optimization
which could be done. See below.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 5 ++++
> drivers/cxl/core/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> index 876469e23f7a..07b87f217e59 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ config CXL_REGION
>
> If unsure say 'y'
>
> +config CXL_ARCH_LOW_MEMORY_HOLE
> + def_bool y
> + depends on CXL_REGION
> + depends on X86
> +
> config CXL_REGION_INVALIDATION_TEST
> bool "CXL: Region Cache Management Bypass (TEST)"
> depends on CXL_REGION
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> index 9259bcc6773c..6e80215e8444 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/Makefile
> @@ -15,4 +15,5 @@ cxl_core-y += hdm.o
> cxl_core-y += pmu.o
> cxl_core-y += cdat.o
> cxl_core-$(CONFIG_TRACING) += trace.o
> +cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_ARCH_LOW_MEMORY_HOLE) += lmh.o
> cxl_core-$(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) += region.o
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c b/drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..da76b2a534ec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/lmh.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +#include <linux/range.h>
> +#include "cxl.h"
> +
> +/* In x86 with memory hole, misaligned CFMWS range starts at 0x0 */
> +#define MISALIGNED_CFMWS_RANGE_BASE 0x0
> +
> +/*
> + * Match CXL Root and Endpoint Decoders by comparing SPA and HPA ranges.
> + *
> + * On x86, CFMWS ranges never intersect memory holes while endpoint decoders
> + * HPA range sizes are always guaranteed aligned to NIW * 256MB; therefore,
> + * the given endpoint decoder HPA range size is always expected aligned and
> + * also larger than that of the matching root decoder
> + */
> +bool arch_match_spa(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> +{
> + struct range *r1, *r2;
> + int niw;
> +
> + r1 = &cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.hpa_range;
> + r2 = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
> + niw = cxled->cxld.interleave_ways;
> +
> + if (r1->start == MISALIGNED_CFMWS_RANGE_BASE &&
> + r1->start == r2->start && r1->end < r2->end &&
Should this be 'r1->end <= r2->end'?
And could that simplify the logic in match_switch_decoder_by_range()? See
below...
> + IS_ALIGNED(range_len(r2), niw * SZ_256M))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Similar to arch_match_spa(), it matches regions and decoders */
> +bool arch_match_region(struct cxl_region_params *p,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + struct range *r = &cxld->hpa_range;
> + struct resource *res = p->res;
> + int niw = cxld->interleave_ways;
> +
> + if (res->start == MISALIGNED_CFMWS_RANGE_BASE &&
> + res->start == r->start && res->end < r->end &&
> + IS_ALIGNED(range_len(r), niw * SZ_256M))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_trim_hpa_by_spa(struct resource *res,
> + struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd)
> +{
> + res->end = cxlrd->res->end;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index ac2c486c16e9..3cb5a69e9731 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -836,8 +836,12 @@ static int match_auto_decoder(struct device *dev, void *data)
> cxld = to_cxl_decoder(dev);
> r = &cxld->hpa_range;
>
> - if (p->res && p->res->start == r->start && p->res->end == r->end)
> - return 1;
> + if (p->res) {
> + if (p->res->start == r->start && p->res->end == r->end)
> + return 1;
> + if (arch_match_region(p, cxld))
> + return 1;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1414,7 +1418,8 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
> if (cxld->interleave_ways != iw ||
> cxld->interleave_granularity != ig ||
> cxld->hpa_range.start != p->res->start ||
> - cxld->hpa_range.end != p->res->end ||
> + (cxld->hpa_range.end != p->res->end &&
> + !arch_match_region(p, cxld)) ||
> ((cxld->flags & CXL_DECODER_F_ENABLE) == 0)) {
> dev_err(&cxlr->dev,
> "%s:%s %s expected iw: %d ig: %d %pr\n",
> @@ -1726,6 +1731,7 @@ static int match_switch_decoder_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled = data;
> struct cxl_switch_decoder *cxlsd;
> + struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd;
> struct range *r1, *r2;
>
> if (!is_switch_decoder(dev))
> @@ -1735,8 +1741,13 @@ static int match_switch_decoder_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> r1 = &cxlsd->cxld.hpa_range;
> r2 = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
>
> - if (is_root_decoder(dev))
> - return range_contains(r1, r2);
> + if (is_root_decoder(dev)) {
> + if (range_contains(r1, r2))
> + return 1;
> + cxlrd = to_cxl_root_decoder(dev);
> + if (arch_match_spa(cxlrd, cxled))
> + return 1;
> + }
If the logic in arch_match_spa() was changed to allow for an equal end
value could this block be simplified to?
if (is_root_decoder(dev)) {
cxlrd = to_cxl_root_decoder(dev);
if (arch_match_spa(cxlrd, cxled))
return 1;
}
> return (r1->start == r2->start && r1->end == r2->end);
> }
>
> @@ -1943,7 +1954,7 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> }
>
> if (resource_size(cxled->dpa_res) * p->interleave_ways !=
> - resource_size(p->res)) {
> + resource_size(p->res) && !arch_match_spa(cxlrd, cxled)) {
> dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev,
> "%s:%s: decoder-size-%#llx * ways-%d != region-size-%#llx\n",
> dev_name(&cxlmd->dev), dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev),
> @@ -3199,7 +3210,13 @@ static int match_root_decoder_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> r1 = &cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.hpa_range;
> r2 = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
>
> - return range_contains(r1, r2);
> + if (range_contains(r1, r2))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (arch_match_spa(cxlrd, cxled))
> + return true;
Same question/simplification here?
Ira
> +
> + return false;
> }
>
> static int match_region_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> @@ -3217,8 +3234,12 @@ static int match_region_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
> p = &cxlr->params;
>
> down_read(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> - if (p->res && p->res->start == r->start && p->res->end == r->end)
> - rc = 1;
> + if (p->res) {
> + if (p->res->start == r->start && p->res->end == r->end)
> + rc = 1;
> + if (arch_match_region(p, &cxled->cxld))
> + rc = 1;
> + }
> up_read(&cxl_region_rwsem);
>
> return rc;
> @@ -3270,6 +3291,22 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>
> *res = DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(hpa->start, range_len(hpa),
> dev_name(&cxlr->dev));
> +
> + /*
> + * Trim the HPA retrieved from hardware to fit the SPA mapped by the
> + * platform
> + */
> + if (arch_match_spa(cxlrd, cxled)) {
> + struct range *range = &cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.hpa_range;
> +
> + arch_trim_hpa_by_spa(res, cxlrd);
> + dev_dbg(cxlmd->dev.parent,
> + "%s: Trim HPA (%s: %pr) by SPA (%s: %pr)\n",
> + __func__,
> + dev_name(&cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev), range,
> + dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), hpa);
> + }
> +
> rc = insert_resource(cxlrd->res, res);
> if (rc) {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 5406e3ab3d4a..a5ad4499381e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -902,6 +902,31 @@ void cxl_coordinates_combine(struct access_coordinate *out,
>
> bool cxl_endpoint_decoder_reset_detected(struct cxl_port *port);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_ARCH_LOW_MEMORY_HOLE
> +bool arch_match_spa(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled);
> +bool arch_match_region(struct cxl_region_params *p,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld);
> +void arch_trim_hpa_by_spa(struct resource *res,
> + struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd);
> +#else
> +bool arch_match_spa(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +bool arch_match_region(struct cxl_region_params *p,
> + struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +void arch_trim_hpa_by_spa(struct resource *res,
> + struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd)
> +{ }
> +#endif /* CXL_ARCH_LOW_MEMORY_HOLE */
> +
> /*
> * Unit test builds overrides this to __weak, find the 'strong' version
> * of these symbols in tools/testing/cxl/.
> --
> 2.46.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists