[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241123202744.GB20633@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:27:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ruan Bonan <bonan.ruan@...us.edu>
Cc: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"longman@...hat.com" <longman@...hat.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"mattbobrowski@...gle.com" <mattbobrowski@...gle.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"eddyz87@...il.com" <eddyz87@...il.com>,
"song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
"yonghong.song@...ux.dev" <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"sdf@...ichev.me" <sdf@...ichev.me>,
"haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Fu Yeqi <e1374359@...us.edu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] possible deadlock in __schedule (with reproducer available)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 03:39:45AM +0000, Ruan Bonan wrote:
> </TASK>
> FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
> name fail_usercopy, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.12.0-rc7-00144-g66418447d27b #8 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor144/330 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffffbcd2da38 ((console_sem).lock){....}-{2:2}, at: down_trylock+0x20/0xa0 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:139
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888065cbd718 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested kernel/sched/core.c:598 [inline]
> ffff888065cbd718 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1506 [inline]
> ffff888065cbd718 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1805 [inline]
> ffff888065cbd718 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0x140/0x1e70 kernel/sched/core.c:6592
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> _printk+0x7a/0xa0 kernel/printk/printk.c:2432
> fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:46 [inline]
> should_fail_ex+0x3be/0x570 lib/fault-inject.c:154
> strncpy_from_user+0x36/0x230 lib/strncpy_from_user.c:118
> strncpy_from_user_nofault+0x71/0x140 mm/maccess.c:186
> bpf_probe_read_user_str_common kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:215 [inline]
> ____bpf_probe_read_user_str kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:224 [inline]
> bpf_probe_read_user_str+0x2a/0x70 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:221
> bpf_prog_bc7c5c6b9645592f+0x3e/0x40
> bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1265 [inline]
> __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:701 [inline]
> bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:708 [inline]
> __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2316 [inline]
> bpf_trace_run4+0x30b/0x4d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2359
> __bpf_trace_sched_switch+0x1c6/0x2c0 include/trace/events/sched.h:222
> trace_sched_switch+0x12a/0x190 include/trace/events/sched.h:222
-EWONTFIX. Don't do stupid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists