[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG40kxH8bQHauBAd1B=UpC7LLAJoS=ETKczL=QWBKqvk=VKh_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:14:48 +0900
From: Hironori KIKUCHI <kikuchan98@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, Christophe Branchereau <cbranchereau@...il.com>,
Ryan Walklin <ryan@...ttoast.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add another panel for
RG35XX Plus (Rev6)
Hello Krzysztof,
Thank you for reviewing.
> no wildcards
Sorry, but I believe these are not wildcards.
As discussed previously, the integrating vendor and device name are
preferred instead of the OEM serial for unidentified OEM panels.
These compatible strings are based on the actual device names:
"RG35XX Plus", "RG 40XXV", "RG40XX H", and "RG CubeXX"
You can refer to
https://anbernic.com/collections/handheld-game-console for the full
line-up.
Oh, regarding "rg40xx-panel", it might have been separated to
"rg40xx-v-panel" and "rg40xx-h-panel".
> don't duplicate schemas
The old schemas "leadtek,ltk035c5444t", "fascontek,fs035vg158", and
"anbernic,rg35xx-plus-panel" exist independently.
So I had to add new schemas since the new ones are not compatible with
the old ones.
Perhaps the compatibles should be like this:
compatible = "anbernic,rg35xx-plus-panel", "newvision,nv3052c";
as some others do.
In this way, the schema files would be a single file and not be messed
up, but it would break the previously defined schemas.
How should I deal with this?
Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.
> BTW, isn't this v2? Where is the changelog and proper versioning of
> patches?
Sorry, I thought the previous version was completely rejected due to
renaming back to "wl-355608-a8".
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20241105-maybe-chamomile-7505214f737e@spud/
But yes, these are somewhat relevant, I'll post the next version as v3
with changelogs. Thanks.
Best regards,
kikuchan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists