linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Fix decision-making issues for memory migration during NUMA balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_34E779C5B2F95F0FBC11D21B2C0B4FAEA107@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 04:41:50 +0800
From: Junjie Fu <fujunjie1@...com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@...el.com, gourry@...rry.net,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Fix decision-making issues for memory
 migration during NUMA balancing



On November 26, 2024 at 4:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 26-11-24 03:45:01, Junjie Fu wrote:
> [...]
>> I apologize for the oversight when reviewing the code regarding the process
>> of setting only the first node in the nodemask for the MPOL_PREFERRED memory
>> policy.
> 
> There is no need to apologize! Really, this code is far from
> straightforward and it is not easy to get all the loose ends together.
> What helps though, is to help reviewers with the problem statement. It
> often helps to state whether the fix is based on code review or it is
> fixing a real life or even artificial workload.

Thank you very much for your understanding and kind words. I truly 
appreciate your helpful suggestion, and I will make sure to provide more 
context and clarity for reviewers in future submissions to avoid any 
confusion.