[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ef421bd-2436-4bfc-951a-52e0ea2d020d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:36:52 +0100
From: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] cpuidle: Do not return from
cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures
> This one and the [2/2] are in the mainline as of today, no need to resend theM
ACK. Purely RFC. I just want to make sure we are all on the same page.
I'll rebase when we all agree on how to solve the problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists