[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <883447da-aeca-41ba-99ef-038dd8ddc6b3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:43:35 +0100
From: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer
cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play_dead()
> If you first make intel_idle provide :enter_dead() for all CPUs on all
> platforms and implement it by calling mwait_play_dead_with_hint(), you
> won't need mwait_play_dead() any more.
Crossed my mind, but because mwait_play_dead doesn't filter on Intel
vendor specifically, I thought that I might break some edge case.
I am all for simplifying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists